How Do Stablecoin Payments Work? Explained
An educational article based on the Tokenized Podcast, co-hosted by Simon Taylor and Cuy Sheffield, featuring insights from Zach Abrams (CEO, Bridge), Rob Hadick (General Partner, Dragonfly), and Anthony Yim (Co-founder, Artemis).
Stablecoins Are Quietly Replacing the Wires
Global B2B payments are a $120 trillion market, and the infrastructure behind them hasn't changed meaningfully in decades. Cross-border wire transfers still take two to five business days. They still cost $20 to $50 per transaction. They still rely on correspondent banking chains where money moves through three, four, sometimes five intermediaries before reaching its destination.
Stablecoins are changing this — not in theory, but in production. Companies like Bridge, BVNK, and Circle are building the rails that allow businesses to move dollars globally in minutes, at a fraction of the cost.
“We're one of the leading companies in this space, and we're talking to basically everyone who does global payouts, and someone within those companies is thinking about advocating for and potentially going through the process of implementing payouts with stablecoins.”
— Zach Abrams, CEO, Bridge
This isn't a crypto-native niche anymore. Stablecoins settled over $10 trillion in onchain volume in 2024 — more than Visa. The question for treasury managers and CFOs is no longer whether stablecoins work. It's how they work, and when to adopt them.
How a Stablecoin Payment Actually Works
At its core, a stablecoin payment follows a straightforward flow. Understanding it requires knowing just five steps:
- Sender initiates payment — A business decides to pay a supplier, contractor, or partner in another country.
- On-ramp — The sender's local currency (USD, EUR, GBP) is converted into a stablecoin like USDC or USDT through a licensed on-ramp provider. This can happen via bank transfer, API integration, or a payment platform.
- Stablecoin transfer — The stablecoin moves across the blockchain from the sender's wallet to the recipient's wallet. This happens in seconds to minutes, regardless of whether the recipient is across the street or across the world.
- Off-ramp — The recipient's stablecoin is converted back into their local currency through an off-ramp provider with local banking relationships.
- Recipient receives funds — The local currency is deposited into the recipient's bank account, typically the same day.
The entire process — from initiation to settlement — can take minutes. Compare that to the three-to-five-day settlement window for traditional correspondent banking, and the advantage is clear.
Three Models: From Crypto-Native to Invisible
Not every stablecoin payment looks the same. There are three distinct interaction models, and understanding which one applies to your use case is critical.
“There are really three distinct models. The first is stablecoins end to end. The second is what happens when one side of the transaction is in fiat. And the third model, which is the most interesting for institutions, is fiat on both sides with the stablecoin as middleware.”
— Cuy Sheffield, Head of Crypto, Visa
Model 1: Stablecoins End to End
Both the sender and recipient hold and transact in stablecoins. No fiat conversion is needed on either side. This model is common among crypto-native businesses, DAOs paying contributors, and companies operating in jurisdictions where dollar-denominated stablecoins are more practical than volatile local currencies.
It's the simplest model — wallet to wallet, no intermediaries — but it requires both parties to be comfortable holding digital dollars.
Model 2: One Side in Fiat
One party operates in fiat and the other in stablecoins. For example, a US-based company pays in USD, which is converted to USDC at the on-ramp, and the recipient — a freelancer in Southeast Asia — receives and holds USDC directly.
This model is growing rapidly in payroll and contractor payment use cases, particularly in regions where workers prefer dollar-denominated assets over local currencies subject to inflation.
Model 3: Fiat on Both Sides (Stablecoin as Middleware)
This is the model that matters most for enterprise adoption. Neither the sender nor the recipient ever touches a stablecoin. The sender pays in their local currency. The recipient receives their local currency. In between, a stablecoin handles the actual money movement.
From the user's perspective, it looks and feels exactly like a traditional bank transfer — just faster and cheaper. The stablecoin is invisible infrastructure, middleware that replaces correspondent banking chains.
This is where companies like Bridge are focused. As Zach Abrams describes it, Bridge is “a global money movement platform built with stable coins that makes moving funds, particularly funds across borders a lot easier.” The end users don't need to know that stablecoins are involved at all.
Why Cross-Border B2B Is the Killer App
Consumer payments get the headlines, but business-to-business payments are where stablecoins deliver the most value. The reasons are structural.
“Stablecoins have been something that we've been talking about for a long period of time, but it hasn't been something that's really been used in payments until really over the last 15, maybe 18 months.”
— Rob Hadick, General Partner, Dragonfly
Speed
A cross-border wire transfer through the correspondent banking system can take two to five business days. On weekends and holidays, it can take longer. Stablecoin transfers settle in minutes, 24/7, 365 days a year. For businesses managing cash flow across multiple geographies, this difference is transformational.
Cost
Traditional wire fees range from $20 to $50 per transaction, and that doesn't account for hidden FX markups and intermediary bank charges that can add 1–3% to the total cost. Stablecoin transfers on modern blockchains cost fractions of a cent. Even accounting for on-ramp and off-ramp fees, the total cost is typically 80–90% lower than traditional rails.
Transparency
With correspondent banking, once you initiate a wire, you have limited visibility into where your money is. It could be sitting in a queue at an intermediary bank. With stablecoin transfers, every movement is recorded onchain. You can see the exact status of your payment in real-time.
Access
Correspondent banking relationships are not available everywhere. Many businesses in emerging markets face limited access to USD-denominated payment rails. Stablecoins are accessible to anyone with an internet connection and a wallet, opening up markets that were previously underserved by traditional infrastructure.
Key Infrastructure Players
The stablecoin payments stack is maturing rapidly. Several companies are building critical layers of infrastructure.
- Bridge — Acquired by Stripe for over $1 billion, Bridge provides APIs that allow businesses to send and receive stablecoin payments globally. Their focus is on making stablecoins invisible — fiat in, fiat out, with stablecoins handling the movement in between.
- BVNK — A payments platform providing on-ramp, off-ramp, and stablecoin settlement infrastructure for businesses. BVNK focuses on enterprise use cases including payouts, collections, and treasury management.
- Circle CPN (Circle Payments Network) — Circle's answer to SWIFT. The CPN is designed to be a network of regulated financial institutions that can settle payments using USDC, with standardised compliance and settlement protocols across participating institutions.
These aren't startups building demos. They're production systems processing real volume for real businesses, and they're attracting serious institutional capital.
Real Use Cases in Production Today
Stablecoin payments are already live across multiple business functions:
Global Payouts
Marketplaces, gig economy platforms, and creator economy companies use stablecoins to pay contractors in 100+ countries. Instead of maintaining banking relationships in every jurisdiction, they use a single stablecoin rail with local off-ramp partners.
Treasury Management
Companies with international operations are using stablecoins to move capital between subsidiaries. What used to require a complex web of intercompany transfers through multiple banking systems now happens in a single onchain transaction.
Supplier Payments
Import/export businesses are adopting stablecoins for supplier payments, particularly in corridors where traditional banking is slow or expensive. A US importer paying a Vietnamese manufacturer can settle in minutes instead of days, improving the cash conversion cycle for both parties.
Payroll
Distributed teams increasingly receive compensation in stablecoins, especially in markets where local currencies are unstable. For the employer, it simplifies multi-currency payroll. For the employee, it provides access to dollar-denominated savings.
Regulatory Considerations
Stablecoin payments are not unregulated. In most jurisdictions, the companies providing on-ramp and off-ramp services are licensed as money transmitters, payment institutions, or equivalent.
Key regulatory frameworks to be aware of:
- US — State money transmitter licences are required for on/off-ramp providers. Federal stablecoin legislation is progressing, with the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act moving through Congress as of early 2026.
- EU — MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) provides a comprehensive framework for stablecoin issuers and service providers, effective since mid-2024.
- UK — The FCA is developing a regulatory framework for stablecoins used as a means of payment, expected to be finalised in 2026.
- Singapore, UAE, Hong Kong — Each has established or is finalising frameworks for stablecoin oversight with a focus on reserve requirements and consumer protection.
For businesses adopting stablecoin payments, the regulatory burden typically falls on the infrastructure providers (the on-ramp, the off-ramp, the platform). But treasury teams should ensure they understand the compliance requirements in every jurisdiction where they operate.
Getting Started
If you're a CFO or treasury manager evaluating stablecoin payment rails, here's a practical starting point:
- Identify your highest-friction corridors — Where are you spending the most on fees and waiting the longest for settlement? Those are your first candidates.
- Choose the right model — For most enterprises, Model 3 (fiat on both sides) is the right entry point. You don't need to hold or manage stablecoins yourself.
- Evaluate infrastructure providers — Look at Bridge, BVNK, and Circle CPN. Ask about their licensing, banking relationships, geographic coverage, and API capabilities.
- Start with a pilot — Pick a single corridor or payment type and run a controlled pilot. Compare speed, cost, and reliability against your existing rails.
- Engage your compliance team early — Stablecoin payments are new territory for most compliance teams. Get them involved before, not after, you start transacting.
The Bottom Line
Stablecoin payments are no longer experimental. They're production infrastructure processing billions in volume for real businesses. The payment flow is simple: fiat in, stablecoin across, fiat out. The economics are compelling: minutes instead of days, cents instead of tens of dollars.
“I just got sick of having no answer. If we as stablecoin players are gonna survive, we have to really change the narrative.”
— Anthony Yim, Co-founder, Artemis
The narrative is changing. The data is there. The infrastructure is maturing. For businesses still moving money through correspondent banking chains, the question isn't whether stablecoin rails are ready. It's whether you can afford to wait.
This article is based on the Tokenized podcast
This article is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business, or legal advice. Views and opinions are those of the contributors and do not represent the opinions of any company they represent. When you buy cryptoassets your capital is at risk. Please do your own research.
This guide is part of the Tokenized learning series — educational content on stablecoins, tokenization, and real-world assets from the Tokenized podcast, hosted by Simon Taylor and Cuy Sheffield.